Health

So I’ve been gone for awhile again – shocker! – but it hasn’t been without good reason, at least to my mind: I had a baby. We’ll call her Miss S. Miss S is 7-weeks-old, and an angel, just like her big sister. But Miss S’s beginning was very different than her sister’s in that she was born naturally, while her sister was a c-section. Which means that yes, I had her by VBAC. And I want to write about it because it’s such a loaded topic, and instills fear in the heart of many women (myself included, pre-Miss S). But the more I talked with people who supported the notion of a VBAC, and the more I read the information in places they directed me toward, I knew that the decision was, for me, the right one, and that it was not crazy. And then just last summer, in the middle of all this talk, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued a statement saying that:

Attempting a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is a safe and appropriate choice for most women who have had a prior cesarean delivery, including for some women who have had two previous cesareans…”The current cesarean rate is undeniably high and absolutely concerns us as ob-gyns,” said Richard N. Waldman, MD, president of The College…”Moving forward, we need to work collaboratively with our patients and our colleagues, hospitals, and insurers to swing the pendulum back to fewer cesareans and a more reasonable VBAC rate.”

Let’s get this out of the way: I’m not some deluded earth-mother out to prove the world wrong. I had a healthy dose of skepticism myself, but at the end of the day I simply wanted the chance to TRY for a VBAC. Just getting my doctor to give me the chance to try was hard enough, let alone to feel that he would be supportive of my laboring like a normal, uncomplicated birth without jumping in for a caesarean for no good reason. Unfortunately, if I wanted a real shot it meant that I had to end my 18-year relationship with my OB-GYN and interview other doctors, which I did. They all had the same stature as him but were what they like to call “VBAC friendly”.

At the end of the day my decision was based on two things:  I did not want to have to recover from major surgery again after having my baby, and now there would be a toddler running around the house; but really most importantly was that for me the c-section the first time around was a complete disappointment, like I know that it can be for many first-time mothers. In the end the reason given for going into surgery was that the baby was too large and would not fit. Well, they were right, she was large. Nine pounds, eleven ounces large. So that was not a lie. That she wouldn’t have come out was always a doubtful prognosis from where I stood. But that is not anything for which we will ever have an answer. My husband and I were happy that she was healthy, and at the end of the day that’s all you can ask for. But I also left feeling like something had been taken away from me, and I couldn’t pinpoint exactly what it was. It left me feeling resentful, a feeling that grew stronger as the time passed. But until we got pregnant again and the reality of a possible VBAC came into play, those emotions were vague and yet strong, with no place to put them that would resolve anything. Not except making peace with it, which I was not ready to do.

I heard, like everyone else, and read many accounts online, of women having successful VBAC’s. You read enough and begin to realize that this is happening, and whether your doctor wants to acknowledge it or not, it’s happening with success. But of course you read these accounts and think, “great, that was them. What about me? Could I be the .2% for whom VBAC’s turn out spectacularly badly?” A risk is a risk, after all. It helped that I switched doctors. Just interviewing other well-respected physicians who worked at the same hospital and were colleagues to my previous doctor immediately took away some of the residual fear. For the ones I chose to meet with, a VBAC was definitely an option. For them the reality was that there is a certain amount of risk involved in childbirth period. PERIOD. The task we are undertaking has danger involved no matter which route you go: natural, caesarean or VBAC. But the odds of them thanks to modern technology are very, very slim. And that actually includes VBAC’s. Most women hear the statistic that only 60-70% of VBAC’s are successful and (I’m assuming) they think that number means that a whopping 30-40% of those women end up with a uterine rupture, which of course is extremely dangerous. The truth is that while 60-70% of women who attempt VBAC are successful, the remainder of those women simply end up with a caesarean for the same reasons any other woman attempting natural childbirth does. Once that was cleared up for me, it really became clear that this decision was the right one.

The doctor I chose had delivered many VBAC’s, which immediately put us at ease. I say “us” because I needed my husband on board 150%, and he was. But she also in agreement with us that there would be no induction and was clear that her number one priority was a healthy baby and healthy mother, i.e. the first sign of distress and we were shutting her down. Not being a kamikaze personality, I agreed with enthusiasm on both accounts. If this was meant to happen, the baby would come on her own, and we would labor without a hitch. Both things babies have been doing for millenia.

So, we didn’t go in there hell bent on a VBAC regardless of whatever developments occurred during labor. We were, as they liked to call us, “reasonable” about our expectations. And that also meant that I had to let this birth go on as any birth would, and not labor under a shroud of “VBAC” the entire time. Doing that was not going to change a damn thing, so I had to go in there just doing what any other laboring mother would do. And in the case of modern medicine and epidurals that meant virtually nothing. Miss S did indeed start to come on her own, albeit 6 days late, just four days short of her deadline for surgery. She started her journey on her own and after I received the epidural continued that journey almost entirely on her own. After laying in bed for eleven hours, being monitored non-stop, they told me it was time to push. The knowledge that we – really she – had come to the point of no return was the most surreal moment of my life. And I did get scared right there. For a couple of minutes. Like shaking and vomiting scared. But the deal was closed. Miss S had done everything she could to get us through this journey safely, which meant that she handled every part of labor like a dream, and now it was my turn to step up and finish this thing we had started. After 45 minutes she was out, and my husband and I were not the only ones celebrating in that room. The doctor and all the nurses were so thrilled to have been a part of a successful VBAC, and it was beautiful to see all the support in that room. That was not something I had ever considered, the impact that our trying for a VBAC and being successful would have on the staff working with us. I think they so infrequently see mothers who are given the chance to try that when they do see it they are genuinely excited to be a part of it. But that morning I was laboring there was another woman down the hall trying for a VBAC as well. I think our numbers are getting stronger.

In those moments that followed, something happened that I did not expect: I not only made peace with my earlier caesarean, I was grateful for it. Miss P WAS large, and while I still think that I could have delivered her, I think it would have been at great physical cost to either one or both of us. My previous doctor had been the right doctor for that particular birth. While I had been resentful because I did not feel like I had been given a choice, I knew in my bones right then that we had been right to trust him and his judgement. And similarly I knew that trying for a VBAC this time had also been the right decision. They were simply two different moments. Two different circumstances which required different decisions. And the only reason I could savor that moment as the closing of a circle was because I had been supported in having a choice. And that’s what I want to say to anyone reading this who has ever considered a VBAC: if you want it, it all starts with your believing that you have the right to ask for it.

To read the most current literature on the feasibility of a VBAC, the foremost resources are:

http://www.ican-online.org/vbac/home

http://www.childbirth.org/section/VBACFAQ.html

{ 0 comments }

Tags: , ,

by:LC

It’s that time of year: Miss P was in the hospital last week after three days with a fever, although thankfully it was nothing serious – a viral infection that was not influenza and just needed to run its course, but after not eating for the larger part of 72 hours, we were worried. Truthfully, there’s not much you can do but treat symptoms. And to that end we’re big fans of the motley crew of products we’ve assembled to get us through any cold. But one thing has been nagging at me – about both her and I, actually – and that’s nasal spray.

I use nasal spray quite a bit. I use it when I travel on airplanes, for the different places that I travel which are dry climates, and for moisturizing in the winter when the heater has been on for Lord knows how many months and the house is just as stuffy as I am. Of course when a child is sick and we need to get all that guck out, well, there’s nasal spray to help. I never gave it any thought because I just kind of assumed that it was only water and salt. In retrospect that’s a pretty dumb assumption because of course these products that sit on shelves for years need preservatives in them. I looked up my preferred brand (Walgreens) as well as Miss P’s (Little Noses), and found the same thing: some harmless ingredients, but two that stood out as concerns: Phenylcarbinol (AKA benzyl alcohol or disodium edetate), and Benzalkonium Chloride. Both ingredients are listed as a “6-7″ on the hazard scale over at Skindeep.com. The former is a preservative, the latter an antimicrobial. I understand why these two ingredients need to be in there, but it doesn’t make me wonder any less. If we’re worried about other preservatives such as the parabens, why not this class of preservatives? And as far as antimicrobials go, I’d prefer not to have the same one that goes into household cleaning products (which Benzalkonium Chloride does) going directly into my head.

I had seen ads for Xlear (pronounced Clear), a nasal spray with Xylitol, and was curious: why Xylitol? I’ve seen it in gum, but…nasal spray? Come to find out it’s a naturally occurring five carbon sugar which was identified decades ago by the Finnish as contributing to good dental hygiene, hence the application in gum, but again…nasal spray? Apparently the type of streptococcus that causes cavities is very similar to the one that causes ear and nose problems, so therein lies the connection between oral health and nasal health. According to this study, xylitol performed better as an antimicrobial than the regular saline spray ingredients because the bacteria could not properly metabolize the xylitol, seems that while most sugars promote bacteria growth, xylitol inhibits it. And according to Dr. Alan Greene, the well-known pediatrician and author of Feeding Baby Green, it has also proven effective at reducing ear infections in children prone to getting them. I for one never would have thought of bacteria as having an appetite, but at least now I know what to feed them.

{ 0 comments }

Tags: , ,

by:LC

Our home is our sanctuary. The place we go to huddle with our loved ones, to relax, to be comfortable. Except that during the summer in Dallas our home becomes more like an insulated fortress: nothing gets in and nothing gets out, including fresh air. It’s stifling outside, so opening the windows to get a breeze flowing through the house is completely out of the question. But without a breeze, all the smells of a house start to slowly creep up on you, swirling together to create one, big nauseating whirl of your lifestyle: whether it’s the new sofa we bought that still smells like some chemical, or the mixture of cooking gas, old paint fumes and cleaning products (albeit non-toxic ones), being indoors is feeling less like a sanctuary and more like a prison. I’d give anything for a cool breeze…

But that’s just Texas in the summertime. For some people it’s a punishing winter. Regardless of the season, being unlucky enough to be stuck indoors brings into relief the fact that everything you bring into a home lives within four walls, pretty much literally sealed off from the world: all your painted/sealed furniture and floors; dyed/treated carpets and fabrics; painted walls; the foam in your cushions and beds; plastic children’s toys; and on and on. Because the air inside our homes was slowly becoming more polluted than the air outside, about two decades ago the medical establishment had no choice but to diagnose something called “sick building syndrome,” which really meant unexplainable malaise and illness due to exposure to toxic materials in poorly ventilated office buildings. NASA undertook a two-year study to  see if household plants could effectively purify the air of common household toxins like benzene and formaldehyde. Their findings were that yes, plants do help to clean the air in indoor spaces, and they released a list of the 15 best houseplants for helping to improve indoor air quality. Needless to say we’ve got alot of vegetation in the house right now, which makes it feel a bit like a hothouse, but that’s more because of all the plants than the outdoor temperature.

{ 0 comments }

Tags:

by:LC

I’m fighting the fight against bacteria, but I’m choosing my battles and my weapons carefully. I will admit to having been one of those people who when Miss P was first born thought along the lines of “if anything touches the ground it is certifiable biohazard material.” Will I do that with another baby? mmmmmm…Yes. When they’re that small, I think overreaching in that direction isn’t a bad thing. But slowly, you start to loosen your rules on what’s fair play. I’m not sure which is the chicken and which is the egg, but by the time the child becomes bigger, stronger and more mobile, either you’ve already decided they can handle the occasional dog hair, or they’re just faster than you and you give up. Whichever it is, you come to realize how resilient human bodies are. Now that doesn’t mean I’m leaving one inch of an airplane window or armrest unsantized, let alone the high chair at a restaurant. Bleck.

All through cold season and on 9 round trip flights in her short little life, we’ve used CleanWell hand sanitizer wipes and spray with great results. Their products are made from an herb-based technology that kills 99% of germs on contact, including staph, e.coli and salmonella. Miss P only got one cold and that was because her cousin was sick and they were sharing toys. I’d rather they play together at Thanksgiving than not. And that was probably a good decision on another front because children need bacteria, they need germs, these things are good for their systems. It’s how human bodies develop defenses and how the immune system knows what is common and what is not.

Unfortunately, there seems to be an imbalance right now between wiping down universally yucky things like a plane window and wiping your child down with hand sanitizer every time they come into contact with the world. If you’re going to do it – and I know the concern comes from a place of love – then at least be cautious of the weapons you use. In order for ethyl alcohol (ethanol), the main ingredient in hand sanitizers, to be effective, the concentration has to be between 65-90%. Anything below that and you’re wasting your money apparently. But what that also means is that a 2 oz. bottle of sanitizer is equal to 4 shots of vodka. Because of the increasing volume of calls they’re receiving regarding children ingesting the stuff, The American Association of Poison Control Centers felt compelled to put out a press release essentially reminding people of the dangers posed to children by the very thing they’re using to protect them.

Similarly but with different ramifications, the FDA has begun advocating for caution against Triclosan, the main ingredient in antibacterial soaps. Even though Triclosan was developed as a surgical scrub for medical professionals, the FDA does not endorse it as any better at fighting bacteria than normal soap and water, and acknowledges that while Triclosan is not currently known to be hazardous to humans: ”several scientific studies have come out since the last time FDA reviewed this ingredient that merit further review. Animal studies have shown that triclosan alters hormone regulation…Other studies in bacteria have raised the possibility that triclosan contributes to making bacteria resistant to antibiotics.” (Italics mine.)

The reality of drug-resistant bacteria proliferating is like the medical equivalent of Hiroshima. That’s not a battle, that’s a war, and not one I have any interest in witnessing…

{ 0 comments }

Tags: , ,

by:LC

The Snotsucker

5.25.10

It’s actually called the Nosefrida, but its less formal name is indeed Snotsucker, and that is exactly what it does. This Swedish nasal aspirator was a Godsend for us when Miss P got her first cold because I personally never felt comfortable with the bulb aspirators. We bought one of course, had it lying around, but the idea that I wouldn’t be able to look inside to see if it was truly clean has always grossed me out, and more importantly, I wouldn’t see what was being cleared out. The Nosefrida is great because it has a transparent blue tube so you can see everything that’s coming out, it allows you to calibrate the force of the suction with your own breath, and the aspirator does not go inside the nose. (Again, the idea of sticking something inside her nose while she’s mildly thrashing about was another reason I was so apprehensive about the traditional aspirators; I just couldn’t get it out of my head that I was going to stick it in too far and hurt her.) Certainly it takes some adjusting, I mean it’s not what we’re accustomed to, but like any new product you have to practice to make perfect. I was home alone with Miss P for her first cold, and after a couple of times we were sailing. I genuinely love it. It gives me a perverse satisfaction to attack all of that mucus in her nose myself. But no matter how strong you may be, remember after each session that it takes two seconds to change out the blue filters – it’s those filters that keep you from getting sick. Important lesson I didn’t just read about…

{ 0 comments }

Tags: , ,

by:LC